Posted by: CS | November 6, 2018

Social Justice

By James Kunstler

It may be as simple as this: voters look at the two parties and decide that they don’t want the nation to turn into a gigantic seminar on race and gender studies. The Democratic Party doesn’t have a platform, it has a curriculum. The party wants to instruct everybody how to think and act. You will be tested regularly on the correctness of your thought. And if you fail or object, say goodbye to your livelihood.

That’s the main reason that the Golden Golem of Greatness plays so well in the forsaken flyover precincts of this troubled land. They are weary of being scolded for their “privilege” by the privileged undergraduates of the most elite campuses. And from there, of course, the astounding hypocrisy informs and infects Democratic politics up to the highest level — e.g. the mendacious sex hysteria engineered by Diane Feinstein and a corps of DC swamp lawyers in the Kavanaugh confirmation hearing.

This year’s main gambit by the Democrats has been the niggerization of white people. Oh, did I say the wrong word? It happens to describe exactly what has gone on: the effort to make white people the object of contempt and loathing. You don’t have to look further than The New York Times and its hiring of Sarah Jeong as an editorial writer — after she was discovered to be the author of Twitter tweets that declared, “Cancel white people,” and “Oh man, It’s sick how much joy I get from being cruel to old white men,” and “dumbass fucking white people….” I’m wondering: is there any ambiguity there? By the way, a search of The Times website for “by Sarah Jeong” comes up absolutely empty, suggesting that they’ve published nothing written by her since she got hired. There’s a show of confidence in their integrity!

Read more

Posted by: CS | November 4, 2018

Bannon Trashes Phony Frum in Toronto Debate

Elsewhere, I have remarked Jordan Peterson’s capacity for making an absolute fool of himself.

To be fair, it should therefore be noted that Peterson does on occasion make very good sense, as in the interview presented below. It should also be noted that it is not difficult to appear sensible in a discussion with an Oxford-trained feminist even while wearing an appalling check suit.

Posted by: CS | November 3, 2018

Trump @ War, a film by Steve Bannon

Posted by: CS | November 2, 2018

More about the hypocrisy of America’s liberals

(1) Liberals promote abortion to poor mothers who can’t afford diapers, but at the same time liberals are encouraging poor countries to have anchor babies in sanctuary cities where all healthcare and education costs are paid for.

(2) Liberals want healthy school lunches and a soda tax to prevent obesity, but then they’ll turn around and say, “Don’t fat shame anyone. We need to accept plus sizes.”

(3) Liberals say it’s “cultural appropriation” for a teenager to wear a Chinese dress, but liberals will also wear a hijab to support Muslims.

(4) Liberals say it’s a mental illness if a man wants to chop off his own leg (Body Integrity Identity Disorder). But then liberals will insist that an 11-year-old boy who wants to chop off his penis should be encouraged with “hormone blockers.”
(5) DACA kids shouldn’t be blamed for the actions of their parents, but liberals say whites have privilege because of their ancestors.
(6) Liberals want background checks for gun buyers, but they don’t want voter IDs to prevent fraud.
(7) Liberals want to “save the earth” by reducing pollution, but chain migration will mean more cars, chimneys, and plastic bottles along with the American lifestyle of consumption. Poor refugees in mud huts will want a TV, iphone, and microwave oven. This will increase carbon emissions.
(8) Liberals want vaccinations for everyone’s health, but the illegals are bringing diseases. “People from Central and South America, ground zero for Zika and other infectious diseases including tuberculosis, dengue, Chagas, Chikungunya and schistosomiasis, make up nearly 15 percent of the illegal-immigrant population”.
(9) Giving someone HIV is no longer a felony in California. Sexual diseases are now spreading faster there, but liberals think it’s because of “racism and stigma.”
(10) Liberals want to protect the ecosystem by removing invasive species, but liberals don’t care if a foreign culture displaces native citizens.
(11) Liberals lock the front door, wear a seatbelt, put a leash on a dog, or use a firewall for the internet. It’s normal to think of security, but liberals want to open the border which allows in drug dealers, sex traffickers, MS-13 gang members, or Muslim extremists.
(12) Liberals want a minimum wage of $15 per hour, but illegals are taking jobs for “$5 to $6 an hour” without paying tax.
(13Nancy Pelosi wrote that Obama’s $40 tax cut per paycheck was a “victory” that “will make a difference.” But now she says $2,000 from Trump’s tax cut would be “crumbs” that are “pathetic” and “insignificant.”
(14) Bernie Sanders owns 3 houses, made over $2 million in 2 years, and paid only 4% to charity in 2014. If Bernie wants a tax cut, then liberals will endorse it. But if Trump wants a tax cut, then liberals will reject it in this video.




Posted by: CS | November 2, 2018

What America Has Become

By Ken Huber

Has America become the land of the special interest and home of the double standard?

Lets see: if we lie to the Congress, it’s a felony and if the Congress lies to us its just politics; if we dislike a black person, we’re racist and if a black dislikes whites, it’s their First Amendment right; the government spends millions to rehabilitate criminals and they do almost nothing for the victims; in public schools you can teach that homosexuality is OK, but you better not use the word God in the process; you can kill an unborn child, but it is wrong to execute a mass murderer; we don’t burn books in America, we now rewrite them; we got rid of the communist and the Socialist threat by renaming them progressives; we are unable to close our border with Mexico but have no problem protecting the 38th parallel in Korea; if you protest against President Obama’s policies you’re a terrorist but if you burned an American flag or George Bush in effigy it was your First Amendment right.

You can have pornography on TV or the Internet, but you better not put a nativity scene in a public park during Christmas; we have eliminated all criminals in America, they are now called sick people; we can use a human fetus for medical research but it’s wrong to use an animal.

We take money from those who work hard for it and give it to those who don’t want to work; we all support the Constitution, but only when it supports our political ideology; we still have freedom of speech, but only if we are being politically correct; parenting has been replaced with Ritalin and video games; the land of opportunity is now the land of handouts; the similarity between Hurricane Katrina and the Gulf Oil spill is that neither president did anything to help.

And how do we handle a major crisis today? The government appoints a committee to determine who’s at fault, then threatens them, passes a law, raises our taxes; tells us the problem is solved so they can get back to their re-election campaign.

What has happened to the land of the free and the home of the brave?


Posted by: CS | November 1, 2018

Tracy Ullman: A Christian Job Interview

Posted by: CS | October 31, 2018

The logic of the Second American Civil War

An excerpt from an essay by:

Angelo Codevilla

The logic that drives each turn of our revolutionary spiral is Progressive Americans’ inherently insatiable desire to exercise their superiority over those they deem inferior. With Newtonian necessity, each such exercise causes a corresponding and opposite reaction. The logic’s force comes not from the substance of the Progressives’ demands. If that were the case, acquiescing to or compromising with them could cut it short. Rather, it comes from that which moves, changes, and multiplies their demands without end. That is the Progressives’ affirmation of superior worth, to be pursued by exercising dominance: superior identity affirmed via the inferior’s humiliation. It is an inherently endless pursuit.

The logic is rooted in disdain, but not so much of any of the supposed inferiors’ features or habits. If it were, the deplored could change their status by improving. But the Progressives deplore the “deplorables” not to improve them, but to feel good about themselves. Hating people for what they are and because it feels good to hate them, is hate in its unalloyed form.

Hence, in our revolution, as in others, which side first transgressed civility’s canons matters only historically. In our revolution, as in others, truth comes to be what serves to increase fellow partisans’ animus against socio-political opponents, and words to mean neither more nor less than what serves the speaker at any given time.

Read full text


Posted by: CS | October 26, 2018

Sweden`s Globalist Elite Suiciding the Nation

Native Swedes May Soon Be Outnumbered By Migrants, As Populist Far-Right In Sweden Surges:

Richard Jomshof, Sweden Democrats MP, has made a dire warning that without any foreseeable change in policy, native Swedes will become a minority in their own country.

Speaking to Parliament, Jomshof also accused the Swedish media establishment of downplaying and diminishing the history of Sweden, saying:

We should remember that there is only one place on earth where Swedes have the right to govern themselves. There is only one place on earth where the Swedes have acquired the right to a country through this endeavor – and this country is Sweden.

Although Swedes aren’t approaching minority status in Sweden overall, several areas in the country such as Södertälje are completely migrant-majority.

All together, 5% of the Swedish population lives in migrant-majority areas. Recent reports have also revealed that mass migration is the only factor pushingSwedish population growth.

Last year, Sweden’s foreign-born population neared 1.7 million, with a staggering 1 in 6 people born outside the country.

After record gains by Sweden’s far-right Democrats in the Parliament, Jomshof’s speech comes on the heels of his party winning so many seats in some areas that they didn’t have enough candidates to fill them all.

Poor Swedes are nearly as badly undermined by their own “leadership`as the Brits, who are already outnumbered in their capital city of London, their second largest city, Birmingham, and many other urban centers including Leicester, Luton and Slough.


Older Posts »